Ruling the Law

Ruling the Law
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 283
Release :
ISBN-10 : 1316630927
ISBN-13 : 9781316630921
Rating : 4/5 (921 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Ruling the Law by : Jorge L. Esquirol

Download or read book Ruling the Law written by Jorge L. Esquirol and published by . This book was released on 2019 with total page 283 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Challenges the distorted hegemonic accounts of Latin American law and reveals their geopolitical and economic consequences in the world today.


Ruling the Law Related Books

Ruling the Law
Language: en
Pages: 283
Authors: Jorge L. Esquirol
Categories: Comparative law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Challenges the distorted hegemonic accounts of Latin American law and reveals their geopolitical and economic consequences in the world today.
The Federalist Papers
Language: en
Pages: 420
Authors: Alexander Hamilton
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-08-20 - Publisher: Read Books Ltd

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Classic Books Library presents this brand new edition of “The Federalist Papers”, a collection of separate essays and articles compiled in 1788 by Alexander
Ruling Before the Law
Language: en
Pages: 321
Authors: William Hurst
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-04-19 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Building on extensive fieldwork in China and Indonesia, Hurst offers a valuable comparison of legal systems in practice.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct
Language: en
Pages: 216
Authors: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2007 - Publisher: American Bar Association

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions lo
Rule By Law
Language: en
Pages: 392
Authors: Tom Ginsburg
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2008-05-08 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Scholars have generally assumed that courts in authoritarian states are pawns of their regimes, upholding the interests of governing elites and frustrating the