Governing with Judges

Governing with Judges
Author :
Publisher : Oxford University Press
Total Pages : 247
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780198297307
ISBN-13 : 0198297300
Rating : 4/5 (300 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Governing with Judges by : Alec Stone Sweet

Download or read book Governing with Judges written by Alec Stone Sweet and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2000 with total page 247 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This text elaborates a theory of constitutional politics. It examines the pan-European movement to confer constitutional review authority on a new governmental institution. Cases show how and to what extent legislative processes have been under the influence of consititutional judges.


Governing with Judges Related Books

Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 247
Authors: Alec Stone Sweet
Categories: Language Arts & Disciplines
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This text elaborates a theory of constitutional politics. It examines the pan-European movement to confer constitutional review authority on a new governmental
Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 232
Authors: Alec Stone Sweet
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher: Oxford University Press on Demand

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Governing with Judges elaborates a theory of constitutional politics, the process through which the discursive practices and techniques of constitutional adjudi
Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 0
Authors:
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Governing with Judges
Language: en
Pages: 232
Authors: Alec Stone Sweet
Categories: Constitutional courts
Type: BOOK - Published: 2000 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Regulating Judges
Language: en
Pages: 448
Authors: Richard Devlin
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-12-30 - Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Regulating Judges presents a novel approach to judicial studies. It goes beyond the traditional clash of judicial independence versus judicial accountability. D