Women, Judging and the Judiciary

Women, Judging and the Judiciary
Author :
Publisher : Routledge
Total Pages : 250
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780415548618
ISBN-13 : 0415548616
Rating : 4/5 (616 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Women, Judging and the Judiciary by : Erika Rackley

Download or read book Women, Judging and the Judiciary written by Erika Rackley and published by Routledge. This book was released on 2013 with total page 250 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Awarded the 2013 Birks Book Prize by the Society of Legal Scholars, Women, Judging and the Judiciary expertly examines debates about gender representation in the judiciary and the importance of judicial diversity. It offers a fresh look at the role of the (woman) judge and the process of judging and provides a new analysis of the assumptions which underpin and constrain debates about why we might want a more diverse judiciary, and how we might get one. Through a theoretical engagement with the concepts of diversity and difference in adjudication, Women, Judging and the Judiciary contends that prevailing images of the judge are enmeshed in notions of sameness and uniformity: images which are so familiar that their grip on our understandings of the judicial role are routinely overlooked. Failing to confront these instinctive images of the judge and of judging, however, comes at a price. They exclude those who do not fit this mould, setting them up as challengers to the judicial norm. Such has been the fate of the woman judge. But while this goes some way to explaining why, despite repeated efforts, our attempts to secure greater diversity in our judiciary have fallen short, it also points a way forward. For, by getting a clearer sense of what our judges really do and how they do it, we can see that women judges and judicial diversity more broadly do not threaten but rather enrich the judiciary and judicial decision-making. As such, the standard opponent to measures to increase judicial diversity - the necessity of appointment on merit - is in fact its greatest ally: a judiciary is stronger and the justice it dispenses better the greater the diversity of its members, so if we want the best judiciary we can get, we should want one which is fully diverse. Women, Judging and the Judiciary will be of interest to legal academics, lawyers and policy makers working in the fields of judicial diversity, gender and adjudication and, more broadly, to anyone interested in who our judges are and what they do.


Women, Judging and the Judiciary Related Books

Women, Judging and the Judiciary
Language: en
Pages: 250
Authors: Erika Rackley
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2013 - Publisher: Routledge

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Awarded the 2013 Birks Book Prize by the Society of Legal Scholars, Women, Judging and the Judiciary expertly examines debates about gender representation in th
Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific
Language: en
Pages: 341
Authors: Melissa Crouch
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-10-07 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

First comparative study of women judges in the Asia-Pacific based on empirical socio-legal research.
Gender and Justice
Language: en
Pages: 330
Authors: Sally Jane Kenney
Categories: Biography & Autobiography
Type: BOOK - Published: 2013 - Publisher: Routledge

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Intended for use in courses on law and society, as well as courses in women's and gender studies, women and politics, and women and the law - this book that tak
Gender, Judging and the Courts in Africa
Language: en
Pages: 346
Authors: J. Jarpa Dawuni
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-11-29 - Publisher: Routledge

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Women judges are playing increasingly prominent roles in many African judiciaries, yet there remains very little comparative research on the subject. Drawing on
Gender and Judging
Language: en
Pages: 640
Authors: Ulrike Schultz
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2013-07-10 - Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Does gender make a difference to the way the judiciary works and should work? Or is gender-blindness a built-in prerequisite of judicial objectivity? If gender