Authoritarian Governance, Decentralization, and State Legitimacy

Download or read book Authoritarian Governance, Decentralization, and State Legitimacy written by and published by . This book was released on 2013 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Motivated by the puzzle of state-led social policy expansion under an authoritarian regime, I examine China's rural health reform at the national level and implementation at the local level through three major questions: (1) Without the pressures of elections, why and how does an authoritarian state expand its role in healthcare? (2) In an authoritarian context, what are the causes and consequences of subnational variation in health policy implementation? (3) Why has inadequate healthcare not generated greater political instability in rural China? Through analysis of original survey data and fieldwork, I further our understanding of the sources of subnational social policy variation and the relationship between social policy and state legitimacy in an authoritarian context. At the national level, I demonstrate that a confluence of domestic and international factors, including changes in policymaking and international discourse regarding social policy, coupled with leadership change and a catalyzing event, precipitated health reform in China. At the subnational level, I show that provincial variation can be attributed two factors. First, because of distinct economic development strategies, Chinese provinces vary systematically in social policy priorities, producing subnational welfare regimes. Second, divergent center-province relations associated with provincial wealth generate different approaches to health policy implementation. Because poorer provinces rely on progressive central government transfers for healthcare, provincial leaders demonstrate compliance with national policy by setting provincial standards for implementation, thereby ensuring that local implementation is ostensibly consistent with central government goals. By contrast, since wealthier provinces are not reliant on central subsidies, they tend to further decentralize implementation and funding for health to lower levels of government. Despite the central government's progressive health subsidies, healthcare continues to lag behind in poorer areas. Although protest abounds in China, persistent problems in rural healthcare have not threatened political stability. I demonstrate that, although social welfare is linked to state legitimacy, villagers' expectations for healthcare are minimal. Consequently, although healthcare services cannot meet basic needs, they are sufficient to appease villagers. By examining health policy in rural China, my research advances our understanding of the relationship between social policy, decentralization, and state legitimacy in China and beyond.